top of page

The Concept of Mega Crisis vs. Conventional Crisis

  • Sep 16, 2025
  • 3 min read

Crises come in many forms, but the distinction between a conventional crisis and a mega-crisis lies in their complexity and severity. While a crisis typically affects a single organization and can often be resolved with internal strategies, a mega-crisis extends into many aspects of society. This analysis highlights why mega-crises, such as COVID-19, pose unprecedented difficulties compared to traditional crises.


From Wix Media
From Wix Media

Mega Crisis vs. Crisis


A mega-crisis is a large-scale crisis defined by its connection of political, religious, cultural and commercial crises involving the media, governments, ambassadors, religious leaders, citizens and private companies (Salmon & Yen, 2017). On the other hand, a conventional crisis is a turning point for an organization in which the severity changes the environment drastically and irreversibly (Salmon & Yen, 2017). As shown in Figure 1, a mega-crisis is not simply a problem or a mess, or even a crisis; it requires both managerial and political perspectives to handle it (Salmon & Yen, 2017).


Figure 1: Mega Crisis Mapping Model from Salmon & Yen, 2017
Figure 1: Mega Crisis Mapping Model from Salmon & Yen, 2017

The two key components of a mega-crisis are:

  1. deep uncertainty

  2. extreme urgency


However, an issue emerges because deep uncertainty requires time to manage, but time is limited due to extreme urgency (Salmon & Yen, 2017). So... how do we respond?


A mega-crisis demands managerial perspectives to meet urgent stakeholder needs and political perspectives to provide long-term resolutions as the mega-crisis evolves (Salmon & Yen, 2017). The managerial perspective aims to provide immediate relief. The political perspective requires flexibility for an ever-changing landscape and involves getting people from many different fields to work together to make decisions. On the other hand, a crisis is managed solely by the organization, which adopts either a managerial or political perspective (Salmon & Yen, 2017). A key component of a mega-crisis is that it does not have an ending point, while a crisis can be contained, and an organization can adapt and recover.


COVID-19 Mega Crisis


The COVID-19 pandemic had a global scope, causing a constellation of political, religious, cultural and commercial crises, affecting all groups. The pandemic has no clear end, and led to uncertainty and a call for urgent solutions.


In an analysis of national responses, governments faced unprecedented crises, having to abandon normal policymaking methods in the face of uncertainty surrounding the pandemic (Boin et al., 2020). It led to significant economic, political and societal costs. Additionally, the media played a significant role in amplifying the urgency for immediate relief and shaping public perception of the mega-crisis.


Commercially and societally, the pandemic caused immense disruption in everyday life. Impact on universities, as private institutions, was immense as they had to rapidly transition to virtual learning, leading to student dissatisfaction and a critical need for effective crisis communication (Hong et al., 2023).


The COVID-19 pandemic was characterized by deep uncertainty and extreme urgency. Governments, leaders, ambassadors, citizens and private institutions across the globe had to respond to urgent needs and utilize diverse perspectives to provide long-term resolutions to the pandemic. The world recognized the distinction between a crisis and a mega-crisis and leaders were able to adopt both immediate managerial perspectives and flexible political perspectives. Recognizing this difference is essential for building resilience in the face of large-scale, interconnected global crises.



References


Boin, A., Lodge, M. & Luesink, M. (2020). Learning from the COVID-19 crisis: an initial analysis of national responses. Policy Design and Practice, 3(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1823670


Hong, S., Kim, B. & Lee, S. Y. (2023). A public health crisis in the university: Impact of crisis response strategies on universities’ transparency and post-crisis relationships during COVID 19 pandemic. Public Relations Review, 49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811123000024?via%3Dihub


Salmon, C. T. & Yen, V. Y-C. (2017). Further explication of mega-crisis concept and feasible responses. SHS Web of Conferences, 33(34). 10.1051/shsconf/20173300034

Comments


Connect with me!

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X

Thanks for Reaching Out!

© 2024 Lexie Oliver. All Rights Reserved.

bottom of page